Skip to main content

I Hate Volunteering

I came across this Best Practices in Internet Ministry post today about volunteers creating and maintaining a church Web site.  The topic itself wasn't so interesting as the idea that staff should be creating and maintaining the church Web site.

While I definitely understand and agree with some of the comments made of volunteers, I've found that the same is often true about staff (either in church or the workplace). 

  • Not good. Too often people think more highly of themselves and their skills than they merit.
  • So far it has been good. Although getting them to keep their pages up to date has been tough.
  • They each have their own ideas about what they think is cool and want to help but really are way behind the times.
  • This post though shows something I've seen happening in a lot of larger, and even some smaller, churches.  They are looking to staff because they don't feel that volunteers are reliable enough.

    This actually comes in different statements like:

    • Our volunteers are too busy to lead
    • The task needs 20 to 30 hours a week of work, which a volunteers don't give
    • Volunteers can't be managed
    • Volunteers don't have the time to manage

    I used to go to some youth minister lunches (when I was a youth minister) and I was the only one there who was a volunteer, the rest were staff.  During that process one of the other youth ministers mentioned that we had a pretty good youth group, so we must have been doing something right.

    There seems to be a growing idea that while the church needs volunteers, staff are necessary for the critical roles.  If we have to rely on volunteers, we'll only get second best results.

    What's interesting is that I attend one of the healthiest, and largest, Episcopal churches in the area.  I used to volunteer about 30 hours a week to youth ministry, but now lead one of the most impressive lay eucharistic ministry (the people in white who give you wine) groups (I didn't make them that way, but I hope to keep them there) and our technology team.

    While I'm probably a little unique, I'm certainly not alone.  We have a volunteer who commits a lot of time to leading our finance committee and leading our mission trips (we're going on four this year).  We have an incredible band which many real bands would be envious of, lead and composed of all volunteers.

    We're recognizing the gifts of the volunteers, and giving them the authority to use those gifts.  In leading Eucharistic Ministers, it's clear that I'm no good at planning and organizing, so my good friend Lisa takes care of that.  Together we've doubled the size of the volunteer group.

    My point here?  Find what someone is passionate about and ask them to volunteer.  If the staff and leadership continually communicate the need for excellence in volunteers, just as we give excellence to God in other areas of our lives, people will come forward and offer their excellence.  Only if no one has the skill, or won't follow the leadership, do you begin looking outside the organization, but even then many roles can be filled by consultants instead of direct staff members.

    I think it's time that we move past publicly "recognizing" how important volunteers are, and instead rely on them so entirely that they have no option but to recognize how important they are.



    Popular posts from this blog

    Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Microsoft Access

    I've answered this question in some form or another far more times than I care to count.  Most often it's a question of "why do I need a fancy Web application when I can just build this myself in two days in Access.  I mean, the data's already in Excel."  So I figured I'd post out what I threw together, I know I've missed some points. Overview Microsoft Access is an ideal solution for relatively small datasets and a limited number of users. From the Microsoft Web site: “As a desktop database, Access is well suited for small, departmental applications. These applications may start as one user’s project. For example, an employee realizes that productivity can be increased if a paper-based process is automated with an Access application. Other users in the department recognize that they can take advantage of the application if additional features are added. As more features are added, more employees run the application. As time goes by, more and more Access

    Red-Gate SQL Compare

    Every now and then I come across a program that becomes so ingrained in my daily work that I hardly know how I'd get by without it.  I'll probably break down a couple over the next few days, but for database work, I have never found anything as good as Red Gate's SQL Compare and SQL Data Compare .  Essentially these tools let you compare two SQL Server databases (all objects, users, permissions, functions, diagrams, anything) and update changes to whichever database you want.  This is amazingly useful for deploying database changes to a test or production environment (do it to production with ridiculous care, even though it will generate a SQL Script for you and run all updates in one transaction), and making sure everything is synchronized. For releases we can just generate the compare script, confirm that the changes match the updates we want to go out, and store it all in one place with the release details.  This is true for both the structure and the data, to

    Beryllium Spheres

    I'm sitting here at home watching The Shadow , easily one of the best movies made based on one of the best old time radio shows.  I hadn't picked up on this earlier, but the weapon used to destroy the city is none other than the same power source used to power the NSEA Protector in Galaxy Quest . I never knew Beryllium was so cool.  Now I want a sphere of my own. Anyone know of other places Beryllium Spheres are mentioned? Peace, +Tom