Skip to main content

One Thing

Do you ever with you could do just one thing and do it well?

I've been off the blogosphere (I sometimes wonder if Rob and three of his blog readers made this term up all on his own) for a little over a week now and looking at my "To-Do" list of blog ideas. I've missed blogging, but none of my To-Do's have been enough to get me on my duff and writing. Then I came across this post on being inflexible by my friend Mason. This got me really interested in Wil's blog and a little bit envious of the fact that he is a programmer, just a programmer. This is evidenced his response of "OMG none of those words mean anything to me. I just write software." to the following comment.

That is why you do things like TDD - in a sense, you model the use cases, which serve as tests. You can in turn derive the interface contracts from them and then write code that you use - which you can then measure code coverage (for both unit & integration testing).

It's funny because, as a consultant/programmer/project manager/college student leader/blogger/father and whatever else is expected of me, I understood all of that language, what he meant by it all and why it makes sense.

Got me wondering, why do we do so many different things? Why do we attempt to be an expert at so many things? The more I see of the world the more I begin to recognize that the people who focus on just one thing really are the happiest. I see a lot of stay at home moms who are just amazingly happy and excellent parents. I see programmers who do strict programming and, while I have a harder time seeing this as being able to work successfully in our organizations, they can put out some really solid code and understand everything about a program. I see priests who focus on only teaching a good Sunday message and nothing else, who become world-famous speakers.

That's not to say none of these people do anything else. I mean, the great speaker still goes on mission trips. The great mother still has fun without her family and the great programmer may also spend time working with the homeless. But we need to recognize that there can only be one thing we're great at. Why don't we recognize what that one thing is that we're passionate about and then realize, often the harder thing to do, that we won't be great at other things? I may be good, even above average, but I'm not going to be great.

I wonder what my "one thing" is. Any idea what yours is?

Peace,

+Tom

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Microsoft Access

I've answered this question in some form or another far more times than I care to count.  Most often it's a question of "why do I need a fancy Web application when I can just build this myself in two days in Access.  I mean, the data's already in Excel."  So I figured I'd post out what I threw together, I know I've missed some points. Overview Microsoft Access is an ideal solution for relatively small datasets and a limited number of users. From the Microsoft Web site: “As a desktop database, Access is well suited for small, departmental applications. These applications may start as one user’s project. For example, an employee realizes that productivity can be increased if a paper-based process is automated with an Access application. Other users in the department recognize that they can take advantage of the application if additional features are added. As more features are added, more employees run the application. As time goes by, more and more Access

Red-Gate SQL Compare

Every now and then I come across a program that becomes so ingrained in my daily work that I hardly know how I'd get by without it.  I'll probably break down a couple over the next few days, but for database work, I have never found anything as good as Red Gate's SQL Compare and SQL Data Compare .  Essentially these tools let you compare two SQL Server databases (all objects, users, permissions, functions, diagrams, anything) and update changes to whichever database you want.  This is amazingly useful for deploying database changes to a test or production environment (do it to production with ridiculous care, even though it will generate a SQL Script for you and run all updates in one transaction), and making sure everything is synchronized. For releases we can just generate the compare script, confirm that the changes match the updates we want to go out, and store it all in one place with the release details.  This is true for both the structure and the data, to

Beryllium Spheres

I'm sitting here at home watching The Shadow , easily one of the best movies made based on one of the best old time radio shows.  I hadn't picked up on this earlier, but the weapon used to destroy the city is none other than the same power source used to power the NSEA Protector in Galaxy Quest . I never knew Beryllium was so cool.  Now I want a sphere of my own. Anyone know of other places Beryllium Spheres are mentioned? Peace, +Tom